>A small correction

>I have a short piece about Harry Potter up on the New York Times site, and it has a small but glaring (to me, anyway) mistake. The passage that reads

Nonreaders found in Rowling a benignly authoritarian guide: she told you what to look at and how to feel about what you saw. Those already accustomed to the pleasures of action learned early on to skip the adverbs, rejoicing instead in the wholly imagined world.

should read

Nonreaders found in Rowling a benignly authoritarian guide: she told you what to look at and how to feel about what you saw. Those already accustomed to the pleasures of fiction learned early on to skip the adverbs, rejoicing instead in the wholly imagined world.

The Times editor is on vacation so I don’t think it will be fixed there anytime soon, and I hate sounding even more clueless than I am. At least I don’t sound as churlishly brain-dead as Orson Scott Card does on the same page; there’s a comfort.

share save 171 16 >A small correction
Roger Sutton About Roger Sutton

Roger Sutton has been the editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc, since 1996. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his M.A. in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a B.A. from Pitzer College in 1978. Follow him on Twitter: @RogerReads.

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    >Roger,

    I already read your comment on the NYT roundtable, and read “fiction” for “action” without even noticing. IANAE (I am not an editor).

    I was impressed by your ability to say something to the point without drawing fire.

    But I think your comment about Card points to a problem with your “we are much to nice” comments earlier on this blog. As soon as someone steps away from “nice” you call him churlish.

    I think that this why we are all much too nice here in blogger land. None of us wants to look churlish. Is there any way to be neither? I’m on the fence, frankly, about which I prefer. Churlish is more amusing, but devolves so quickly to something worthless.

    `h

  2. >I think it’s hilarious that Hank Green has suddenly become a go-to big-mouth on the subject of Harry Potter. Go Nerdfighters!

  3. Roger Sutton says:

    >What I think is churlish is his point that the People Have Spoken and any Harry naysayers can just go neener-neener-neener.

  4. Anonymous says:

    >And I agree with you. I’d also go so far as to say that anyone who thinks Harry Potter gained its popularity on the basis of merit is a chump. That makes ME churlish and yes, it is fun over here on the dark side.

    `h

  5. >Roger, it could have been much worse. Friction, for example.

  6. a. fortis says:

    >Now, that was an interesting array of opinions on the Harry Potter phenomenon–thanks for the link. I thought that you and Lois Lowry were especially even-handed and tactful.

    I say this as a reader who did enjoy the series for its adventure and imagination–and as a writer who was able to acknowledge its flaws…

  7. rindawriter says:

    >Very nice to see that the New York Times is as imperfect as the rest of us……

  8. rindawriter says:

    >…but I truly think that people are going to “read” the right word in there anyway and listen to what you said since what you said was compelling.

    Everyone who reads something like the Times anyway knows no one can get anything in the New York Times without editors putting it into actual print…and the same readres are going to be intelligent enough to know that editors can goof once in a trillion years or so…and, especially, to know that the errors in print in a newspaper are NEVER the author’s fault.

    A bit high-handed newspapers anyway with the editing process…oops not enough space, snip, snip, snip…..

  9. Saipan Writer says:

    >I think your analysis on HP was interesting.

    You and Orson Scott Card have at least one thing in common in your NYT blurbs–you’ve both got typos.

  10. hp battery says:

    >Battery For HP Omnibook F2024A XE3 XE3B XE3C XE3L F2024
    Battery fit HP Pavilion N3000 N3200 N3300 N3400
    Battery HP 371916-001 378858-001 HSTNN-DB02 HSTNN-IB04
    Battery HP 371916-001 378858-001 HSTNN-DB02 HSTNN-IB04
    New Battery HP Pavilion XZ/ZT/XT/XT1000 xt1500 F3172A
    NEW Battery HP Omnibook 6000 6100 F2019 F2019A F2019B

    New Battery For Compaq/HP F4812A F4809A 319411-001
    Battery For HP NX6120 NC6100 NC6120 NX6100 6515B NX6325
    New Battery for HP zt3000 zt3001US zt3010US 337607-001
    HP BATTERY for COMPAQ PRESARIO V2000 V4000 M2000 DV4000
    HP BATTERY for COMPAQ PRESARIO V2000 V4000 M2000 DV4000
    New Battery for HP Compaq Notebook NC4000 NC4010 DD880A

    New Battery for HP NC8230 HSTNN-DB11 381374-001 PB992A
    12-cell Battery For HP/COMPAQ HSTNN-MB09 HSTNN-MB10
    Genuine HP Battery Pavilion dv9000 Series 432974-001
    New 6 Cells Battery for HP V3000 V6000 DV2000 DV6000
    New 6 Cells Battery for HP V3000 V6000 DV2000 DV6000
    Genuine HP Battery NC4200 NC4400 TC4200 TC4400 PB991A

    Genuine 12 Cell 73Whr HP TX1000 TX2000 battery HSTNN-OB76
    laptop battery for HSTNN-OB53 447649-321
    laptop battery for HSTNN-OB53 447649-321
    NEW Battery for HP 500 520 Series 438518-001 440267
    GENUINE HP PAVILION ZE2000 DV1000 V2000 BATTERY 398065
    Battery For HP NX6120 NC6100 NC6120 NX6100 6515B NX6325

    Battery For HP Pavilion DV8000 DV8100 DV8200 DV8300 B26
    BATTERY for HP COMPAQ v1000 nc6000 nx5000 nw8000 nc8000
    compaq hp Presario B2000 366114-001 HSTNN-B071 LB32111B b2000
    laptop battery for HSTNN-A10C M62044L W62144L
    Battery fit HP Pavilion ZD7000 ZD7100 ZD7200 ZD7300
    laptop battery for hp nx4300 b1800

    Battery for HP COMPAQ B1900 HSTNN DB35 new
    Battery for Compaq hp 405231-001 407672-001 HSTNN-CB25
    HP Compaq OEM 9 Cell Battery 2400 2510p EH768AA nc2400

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*