Science, My Aunt Fanny

baby mozart Science, My Aunt FannyCongratulations to Alice Munro. What should I read by her?

You might guess from that question that I am not the world’s heaviest lifter of “literary fiction,” and am not even sure I know it when I see it. The New York Times recently reported on a study published in Science which purported to suggest that reading “literary fiction” upped a person’s empathy quotient where reading “popular fiction” (and nonfiction) did not. It sounds fishy (these guys think so too).

The way the researchers chose their reading selections is betrayed by circularity (and the passive voice):

Difficulty in precisely quantifying literariness notwithstanding, some works are considered particularly good examples of literature and are recognized with prestigious awards (e.g., the National Book Award). Although selected through an inherently inexact process, prize-winning texts are more likely to embody general characteristics of literature than bestsellers of genre fiction (e.g. romance and adventure stories).

If I’m following that correctly, the difference between Literature and other books is that Literature is Literature. Even more problematic is the fact that the research subjects read from either literary (Chekhov, DeLillo, Erdrich*) or popular (Gillian Flynn, Heinlein, Pilcher) selections for a total of THREE TO FIVE MINUTES before having their empathy measured. What can that possibly tell you? (And how were the excerpts excerpted?) It’s starting to sound like the Mozart Effect. Plus, isn’t it possible that reading five minutes worth of arty DeLillo just might make someone a little more amenable to subsequently taking a Cosmo-like psychological test that might be marginally more fun and less boring? Whereas those drawn into Gone Girl might have been, like, hey, fuck ALL you people and gimme my book back. But I speculate.

While in children’s books we also have a continuum between formula fiction and Octavian Nothing, I like to think we are far more nuanced about the differences and similarities–and about what book speaks to which reader when. Thankfully, we’ve been at this for a lot longer than five minutes.

 

*And I still maintain that The Round House, winner of the National Book Award and used in this research study, was more Erdrich’s attempt to have a Jodi Picoult Moment than it was “literary fiction.”

 

 

share save 171 16 Science, My Aunt Fanny
Roger Sutton About Roger Sutton

Roger Sutton has been the editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc, since 1996. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his M.A. in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a B.A. from Pitzer College in 1978. Follow him on Twitter: @RogerReads.

Comments

  1. I’ve been told that “The love of a good woman” is a good place to start, by my friend who reads mostly literary fiction.

    I’ve found that reading doesn’t make you a better person, it just makes you a more interesting person to other people who read books.

    xo,
    SL

  2. Alice Munro isn’t heavy lifting. She is just wonderful and satisfying. Read anything she wrote, anything at all.

  3. Hmmm… maybe start with “The Turkey Season,” first published in the Dec. 29, 1980, New Yorker.

  4. Ha!! I LOVE your GONE GIRL take! GREAT article. I have this argument a lot with everybody. “Literary” is the cool stuff on the back of a cereal box. Whatever WORKS for you and makes you a nicer person works for me! :-)

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*