Subscribe to The Horn Book

>Gossip in the Stacks

>Neatly tying the last two blog entries together, I see there has been some discussion, prompted by Naomi Wolf’s Times article, on the PUBYAC listserv about the inclusion of the Gossip Girls books in public library YA collections. (PUBYAC is “an Internet discussion list concerned with the practical aspects of Children and Young Adult Services in Public Libraries, focusing on programming ideas, outreach and literacy programs for children and caregivers, censorship and policy issues, collection development, administrative considerations, puppetry, job openings, professional development and other pertinent services and issues.”) One defence made of NOT purchasing such titles was, secondhand, from a book review editor: “most libraries do not have an abundance of money to spend on questionable purchases.”

Questionable was left undefined, as it usually is (like offensive). Questionable meaning, “I don’t have an audience in my library for these books,” fine. But questionable as “in questionable taste,” or as in “I’m gonna get in trouble,” not so fine. As well, the “we only have a limited amount of money” argument is no defense, either: if you only have a limited amount of money, don’t you want to spend a large chunk of it on books that kids already want to read? When I was in library school, Zena Sutherland took the line that libraries needn’t buy Nancy Drew, etc. (I see I’m dating both Zena and myself!) because kids could buy them for themselves, and indeed such books were published with both eyes on the mass market, not on institutional sales. But then I went out and worked with kids who could not (or would not) buy books for themselves. In my opinion, the stocking of mass-market paperbacks in a public library is a signal to kids that their interests are represented and respected. Why should a kid respect my recommendation of, say, Francesca Lia Block, if I don’t respect the kid’s enjoyment of Gossip Girls? (Note: I don’t think you have to have respect for what somebody is reading in order to respect her right to her own taste.)

Roger Sutton About Roger Sutton

Roger Sutton has been the editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc, since 1996. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his M.A. in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a B.A. from Pitzer College in 1978. Follow him on Twitter: @RogerReads.



  1. Andy Laties says:

    >My relevant footnote from REBEL BOOKSELLER:

    “The great Zen Master Yang-shan said, ‘In my shop I handle all kinds of merchandise. If someone comes looking for rat shit, I’ll sell him rat shit. If someone comes looking for gold, I’ll sell him pure gold.’”—quoted in “Notes,” Bhagavad Gita, Translated by Stephen Mitchell (New York: Harmony, 2000): 191. This I gather is a gloss on Mahayana Buddhism’s key doctrine of Expedient Means: “Numberless thousands of myriads of millions of kinds of living beings come before the Buddha and hear the Dharma [law]. The Thus Come One [Buddha] at this time observes these beings, their keenness or dullness, their exertion or laxity, and in accord with what they can bear, preaches the Dharma to them in an incalculable variety of modes, each causing them to rejoice and enabling them speedily to gain good advantage.”—Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma (The Lotus Sutra), Translated from the Chinese of Kumarajiva by Leon Hurwitz ([circa 350-410 A.D.] New York: Columbia University Press, 1976): 102.

    Of course this neatly casts we critics, librarians, booksellers, and other authority figures as Buddhas. And, why not?

  2. Andy Laties says:

    >I apologize for so blatantly plugging my own book. Yuck. I’m still not used to modulating my identity as an “author”.

  3. rindambyers says:

    >Nothng wrong with initiating spaces and places and times for respectful dialogue in a bookstore as well as a library. Might sell more books of all kinds.

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind