>Maybe they just have better things to do.

>Considering that it’s kind of like a Guinness Book of World Records for grownups, I guess I’m not surprised that less than 15 percent of Wikipedia’s contributors are female.

I’ve dotted an i or two over there but that’s it; I wish the survey had asked the respondents if they were employed!

share save 171 16 >Maybe they just have better things to do.
Roger Sutton About Roger Sutton

Roger Sutton has been the editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc, since 1996. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his M.A. in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a B.A. from Pitzer College in 1978. Follow him on Twitter: @RogerReads.

Comments

  1. Patrick Milne says:

    >I get the urge to correct grammar in a lot of those posts. Still, I would stay on that site for hours if I could.

  2. Alex Flinn says:

    >I admit to doing a minimalist Wikipedia article about MYSELF years ago, because that seems to be the only site kids check for reports anymore (I make my daughters check out books for their papers, even if the teacher doesn't require it, and their reports are always so much better than everyone else's). After I made the page, other people improved upon it. I check once in a while to make sure it's still accurate. Otherwise, I've never known anyone who wrote an article.

  3. kellybarnhill says:

    >I was pretty surprised at that statistic, actually. I know two people who are regular Wikipedia editors, both of whom are women.

    However, it does ring true with another experience: back in my classroom teaching days, and even now when I'm brought in as an ad-hock writer-in-the-schools, boys have been the ones to raise their hands. Always. If I want to have gender balance in the discussion, I have to actually solicit the girls to give their opinions – while the boys are nearly levitating out of their chairs from over-enthusiastic hand raising.

    Not really sure what to make of it, but I'll tell you what, this phenomenon of female reluctance to add their voice and expertise to the conversation – it starts young.

  4. >While the men are "working" on their Wikipedia entries it's a safe bet that the women are working on helping the kids with their homework, making supper, giving baths and putting them to bed. The third shift is still a reality.

  5. Roger Sutton says:

    >I think men (taken as a group) are more interested in being "experts" than are women (ditto). But I look at the work involved in putting a Wikipedia article together properly and think, "what's in it for me?" If I were the kind of person who enjoyed amassing information like a stamp collection, I guess the labor would be its own reward, though. I also think people like being part of the Wikipedia community, if the action on the many "Talk" pages is an indication. There are some pretty heated debates!

  6. >I edited an article on the massasauga rattlesnake when I saw that somebody had written, "The snake eats mice, frogs, and small children." Honestly!

    But other than that, Beth's right — my husband's doing admin work on a music database site and I'm sitting on my kid to get her to do the homework. What gives?!

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*