| |
From
the March/April 1997 issue of The Horn Book Magazine
Rumpeta-ing through Reading:
Picture Books for the Very Young
By Martha V. Parravano
y
daughter Emily has always been a reading omnivore: we have photos
of her poring over books from the time she could first sit up. Everything
was of interest: catalogs featuring photographs of children; books
verging on toys, with flaps or holes or even wheels; concept books;
story books. Gradually, certain authors and books became favorites,
and through a curious alchemy of interactions — child and
parent with the book, and child and parent with each other —
they seemed only to get better and better over time.
We read books by Eve Rice, especially Sam Who
Never Forgets and Benny Bakes a Cake. Rice’s
world in these books is immensely reassuring, with small disasters
(Did Sam the zookeeper really forget to feed Elephant? What will
happen now that bad dog Ralph has eaten Benny’s birthday cake?)
transformed into hugs, birthday parades, and other expressions of
love. Rice’s books surprise when read out loud: her prose
has a tendency to form itself into meter and rhyme, appropriate
for these structured stories.
We read Anne Rockwell, one of the best at reflecting
and celebrating a child’s own world. Her pictures are perfectly
ordered, whether crammed full of detail (an entire town busy with
seasonally appropriate activities, in First Comes Spring)
or rivetingly simple (a close-up of a sled, in The First Snowfall).
Rockwell is also spectacular on that other topic of perennial interest
to toddlers, machines and vehicles. Big Wheels is a modern
preschool classic.
And we read Shirley Hughes, a master at inhabiting
the minds and emotions of small children. Particularly appropriate
for the very young are her Alfie and Annie Rose books (Alfie’s
Feet and Alfie Gets in First being our personal favorites),
her small-format concept books Bathwater’s Hot, Noisy,
and When We Went to the Park, and her “doing”
books (Giving, Chatting, Bouncing, etc.).
Hughes’s specific, urban British settings add to her books’
believability: her child characters are so rooted in their home
places that the child reader feels at home as well.
But the two creators most consistently on Emily’s
hit parade were Donald Crews and Byron Barton. Crews’s Freight
Train is a spellbinder; it creates such a strong mood that
the words — like the smoke of the train that’s “going,
going, gone” — quite literally seem to hang in the air
for a few minutes after you finish reading. Crews’s strong
graphics are perhaps the most appealing aspect of his other books;
in School Bus two-year-old Emily developed a ritual of
pointing out all the vehicles of interest: school buses, city buses,
taxis, and the particularly exciting garbage truck (and each time
we found the cameo of the author-illustrator himself, on a street
corner, portfolio tucked under his arm, Emily would croon, “Donald
CROOOOZ!”).
Byron Barton is a guaranteed success with his direct,
no-nonsense texts (“Hey, you guys! / Let’s get to work.
/ Knock down that building. / Bulldoze that tree”); his bold
typefaces; his black-outlined, color-blocked pictures of machines,
astronauts, construction workers, dinosaurs (hear any bells going
off in your toddler-interest geiger counter?). There wasn’t
a detail Emily wasn’t fascinated with, from counting how many
construction workers were girls and how many boys in Machines
at Work (quoted from above) to carefully tracing the Diplodocus’s
“long, long neck” and “long, long tail”
in Dinosaurs, Dinosaurs.
There were many other individual favorites, as
well. In addition to high-interest subjects, these books shared
three other characteristics. First, a pacing appropriate for the
material and for the age group. Successful books take into account
the young child’s attention span. The length of the text per
se is not a guarantee of success. Some of our favorites had quite
a lot of words; however, these books had zesty texts full of repeated
phrases and a lot of broad action. Other books contained few words,
but the field of action was limited, and the pictures carried much
of the story.
Second, a use of repetition, whether in repeated
words or in story structure. We saw this in almost every book we
read and loved. Some of our favorites were the Provensens’
Old Mother Hubbard, with a page turn before the dog’s
nonsensical reaction to each Mother Hubbard action is revealed;
Blueberries for Sal, with its parallel stories of Little
Sal and Little Bear and its chantable kerplink kerplank kerplunk
sounds; and Sue Williams’s I Went Walking, similar
to Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See? but with a
satisfying and child-pleasing story framework.
Third, a construction that allowed for (but did
not demand) some kind of reader participation. Many of the best
books for small children seem to be constructed with some room in
them — space that lets the child and the adult expand the
reading experience. For instance, one of the first things we all
seem to teach our children are the sounds different animals make,
and many books seem to tacitly encourage mooing and meowing
simply by picturing cows and cats. (See Nancy Tafuri’s Early
Morning in the Barn for an ingenious, overt animal-sounds book.)
These books are complete in themselves, and work perfectly well
when read aloud without embellishment. But they also seem to promote
participation — whether it be points in the narrative art
that call for comment; strategically placed wordless spreads that
provide a chance to recap action or to prepare for what comes next;
words or phrases in the text that call for gestures or actions;
or situations that call for something as simple as added sound effects
(like animal sounds). And some of them provide opportunities to
carry over some of the delights of baby-play (such as “This
little piggie” or “Trot, trot to Boston”) into
the comparatively new experience of reading.
Nancy Tafuri’s minimalist The Ball Bounced
was one of our earliest favorites — a perfect transition from
board book to picture book. With its brief (33 words), verb-heavy
text, its homey, familiar setting, and its satisfyingly circular
plot full of surprise and action, it affords a short but complete
reading experience, and mirrors the adventure small children find
in the most mundane of activities. As a baby is being carried out
the back door in Mother’s laundry basket, he jettisons his
ball, and off it bounces. “The cat jumped. / The water splashed.
/ the dog ran / the door slammed,” etc., until the ball stops
— right next to the baby. “And the baby laughed.”
(The ball’s eventful and entertaining journey is baby’s
to enjoy alone, by the way: Mother has her back turned, hanging
out the laundry — a shared secret between book character and
child reader.) Tafuri’s pictures are bold, in extreme close-up;
they held Emily’s attention completely. But the active verbs
encouraged me to add a kind of fingerplay to the already-satisfying
experience of the book: I would walk my two fingers along the pages
as the dog ran, flap my hand up in flight along with the bird (and
land with a tickle), and “slam” the book with my arm
in imitation of the door. She never failed to laugh at the end,
along with the baby.
In John Steptoe’s Baby Says, the
story is all in the two brothers’ faces. Baby — who,
plump and cuddly in his molten-sunshine pajamas, is the epitome
of babyhood, both nuisance and pure joy — wants out of the
playpen, and pesters his big brother until that softy lets him out.
Then, parroting brother’s words — ”Okay. Uh, oh.
No, no” — he heads straight for the irresistible tower
of blocks brother has laboriously constructed, and knocks it down.
Then follow two glorious spreads, one wordless, with brother glowering
at mischievous baby, the next showing brother won over by baby’s
spontaneous kiss. “Okay, baby. Okay.” By supplying just
seven words in different combinations, the author forces the adult
reader to pay close attention to this small home movie of a picture
book. Intonation is everything. Knowledge of who is saying what
is everything. But whether it was the emotion-filled pictures, the
repeated words (with someone else being told “no”),
or our own narration, Emily loved it. And since she called it “Uh-oh,”
she could ask for it before she could talk.
A more recent beautifully-paced-for-toddlers book
is Peggy Rathmann’s sweet and sly Good Night, Gorilla.
What will your child like most about it? Following the progress
of the released balloon? Eagerly awaiting that cartoon-like sequence
of big and small goodnights followed by a pair of very surprised
eyes popping open in the dark? It will probably vary from night
to night, but there will always be something to keep a small child’s
attention.
Two of our all-time favorite books raised the use
of repetition to high art. Elfrida Vipont and Raymond Briggs’s
brilliant Elephant and the Bad Baby begins with a deceptive
innocence: “Once upon a time there was an elephant.”
We see a massive elephant standing still — though it soon
will prove itself very light on its feet (and equally light-fingered)
— dwarfing the airplanes buzzing about it like mosquitoes.
The elephant meets up with a “bad baby,” and they soon
become the Thelma and Louise of the picture-book set, rampaging
through town lifting goodies from this shop and that. Though it
looks like it has far too many words for young children, in fact
it is the ideal two-year-old book: a romp so full of action and
choice repetition and so perfectly paced that it is more like an
exhilarating amusement-park ride than a picture book. Much controversy
has arisen over the plot (we are talking rampant shoplifting here)
and over calling the baby “bad” (though he does learn
to say please); all that went right over the head of Emily-at-two.
She loved the refrain, which virtually repeats as is on each page,
with only the scenes of the crime changing: “Soon they met
an ice cream man. And the Elephant said to the Bad Baby, ‘Would
you like an ice cream?’ And the Bad Baby said yes. So the
Elephant stretched out his trunk, and took an ice cream for himself
and an ice cream for the Bad Baby. And they went rumpeta rumpeta
rumpeta, all down the road, with the ice cream man running after.”
She loved those galloping rumpetas, the contrast between
the immense elephant and the small baby, the angry merchants going
“bump into a heap,” and the reassuring ending to the
wild adventure, as the elephant rumpetas off into the night, “but
the bad baby went to bed.” Here is a perfect last sentence:
the alliteration and the rhythm and the droning emphasis of those
one-syllable words winding down the book like a worn-out baby.
John Burningham’s Mr. Gumpy’s Outing
was practically Emily’s mantra as a small child (she used
it, rather than the traditional blanket or stuffed animal, as her
so-called “comfort object”). Here the repetition is
in story structure, as two children and then a succession of animals,
each larger than the last, politely ask to join Mr. Gumpy on his
boat ride. “‘Can I come along, Mr. Gumpy?’ said
the rabbit. ‘Yes, but don't hop about.’” Never
mind that the average one- and two-year-old doesn’t know enough
animal behavior to be able to anticipate the inevitable disaster.
The introduction of each personality-rich animal in close-up on
the righthand page (as the left page shows the ever-more-crowded
boat) and Mr. Gumpy’s unheeded warnings allow for the incorporation
of a variety of sounds and actions (the most fun is the pig “mucking
about” and chickens flapping: the mucking about calls for
some creative interpretation, and the flapping calls for a lot of
energetic exercise). The two double-page spreads — of the
capsize and the tea party — provide plenty of time and space
to locate and identify all the characters. (It was of particular
interest to the pre-verbal Emily that the little girl’s hair
flew straight up as she fell into the water; Emily would always
make her own hair stand straight up as well.) The book’s pacing
is impeccable, from the introduction of Mr. Gumpy and the build-up
of the appealing animal cast, to the exciting, kersplashing climax,
to the reassuring resolution. Again, the book has a remarkably satisfying
last line: an open-ended, inclusive, circular “come for a
ride another day.”
Two more recent examples of books using repetition
with great success are Ashley Wolff’s Stella and Roy
— a wonderful, toddler-empowering tortoise-and-the-hare variant,
in which slow and steady wins the race for younger brother Roy on
his little four-wheeler (“and Roy rolled right on by”)
— and Minfong Ho’s Hush!: A Thai Lullaby, with
its humorously overzealous mother trying to hush all the animals
in the jungle in turn so that her baby can sleep.
These are just a few examples of what’s out
there for the youngest reader. There is much more to recommend and
share — whether you read books straight through or make them,
when appropriate, into more participatory experiences. (Obviously,
how much embellishment you add depends on the material, the situation,
and the child. You wouldn’t add train sounds or quiz your
child on color identification if you were reading Freight Train
at bedtime to a sleepy toddler.) For us, the books in which we participated
— the ones in which that curious alchemy took place —
are the ones we both remember best. We’ve moved on now, to
books for older picture-book readers — and Emily has long
since outgrown the need for those transitional moos and bounces.
But at age one, and at two, such participation helped make reading
into something active, something she helped make happen. And that
seems like the first step toward the more internal but just as participatory
activity of independent reading — and toward a lifelong love
of books.
Martha
V. Parravano is senior editor of The Horn Book Magazine. |
 |
|
|