| From
the January/February 2006 issue of The Horn Book Magazine
Liftoff:
When Books Leave the Page
BY JEAN GRALLEY
t
has been said that if Gutenberg came back today, there’s little
he would recognize. Our mass transport, mass communications, and
mass media have completely transformed the world. But he would recognize
a book. It’s one of the few things that haven’t changed
in five hundred years.
I’m a picture book writer and illustrator.
I had the great good luck to study with Maurice Sendak at Parsons
School of Design and to find a mentor in Trina Schart Hyman —
two artists who are pillars of the tradition if there ever were
any. Because of them, I love everything about the traditional picture
book art form. But when I discovered a hidden world of picture book
artists who are creating traditional books in radically nontraditional
ways, I was fascinated and hooked. As I played with these new computer
programs (and loved what I was creating), it dawned on me that my
very thinking was being re-wired. Story ideas came that didn’t
work well on paper. I know I’m not the only creative person
in the children’s book community feeling this lift under the
heels, this pull in a new direction, but I don’t hear much
conversation about it. I’d like to start that conversation
here.
I’ll begin by describing what’s changed
in art-making. Artists who work digitally may begin with a sketch
on paper, but with one swoosh of the scanner, it’s sent into
our computers, where the monitor becomes our drawing board and canvas.
Our art glows more warmly onscreen than it could ever do on paper.
Sketches are e-mailed to art directors as JPEGs; finished art is
burned to a CD and sent by FedEx. Because the software is so sophisticated
now, illustrations that picture book readers might assume are watercolors,
oils, or pastel drawings may well have been entirely created on
the computer. For more and more children’s book illustrators,
the first time our art hits paper may be when it’s printed
and bound in a book.
Because the end result looks so familiar and traditional,
this might seem like a small point. But beyond the amazing mimicry
of traditional illustration is the more amazing possibility of going
further.
After centuries of thinking of books and paper
simultaneously, picture book artists who work digitally are beginning
to uncouple books from print. More pointedly, we’re becoming
able to uncouple the idea of the book from “paper thinking.”
Paper thinking assumes that text and art are flat, books proceed
in one direction, and illustrations are fixed. But the visual imaginations
that work with digital tools are beginning to see in ways that are
multidimensional, multidirectional, and in motion.
Animation is one natural form for this art-in-motion.
But e-books offer very new, very exciting possibilities with a format
and agenda distinct from animation. E-books, with their fantastic
ability to cross-reference, layer, and update information with ease
and speed, are already being embraced, especially in academia. But
developing their unique promise as a visual medium could make us
re-think what a book is, in truly revolutionary ways.
It makes sense that we children’s book illustrators
would be the ones to take this step. We love to play with materials
and forms. We’ve carved into pages with die-cuts and blossomed
over pages with pop-ups. Now some of us are thinking of leaving
the page altogether.
BEFORE
I DESCRIBE some of the ways these new picture e-books could be different
from traditional books, and the ways they might be the same, let
me take the bull by the horns and address some of the prevalent
objections to digital books.
First, why should we be hopeful about e-books for
kids at all? Looking at most digital picture books today, we see
scanned spreads on a monitor, “pages” that the young
reader “turns” via a mouse or keyboard, sometimes even
digitally enhanced with twitches and noises. These sorts of things
are Exhibit A for the contention that digital books convolute what
is simple and pure on paper.
We are all on the same page here, so to speak.
It’s ridiculous to make a monitor do what paper does better.
But the problem is not that things have gone too far but that they
haven’t gone far enough. Let digital be digital. Let the digital
medium create stories that can’t be told as well on paper
— or told on paper at all. Imagine a story progressing not
by page turns but by proceeding up, down, to the right, or even
to the left. Imagine words and pictures appearing, receding, and
gliding into place. Envision stories that might proceed by unfolding
like a flower, or sinking as if into a black hole in space. As digital
artists are leaving the linear flatness of “paper thinking,”
our visual imaginations are moving into dimensional space.
Another objection: who wants to read a book while
sitting in front of a monitor on a desk? Another easy answer: practically
no one. Although progress has slowed over standardizing a format,
handheld readers are coming. By the time these new e-books are ready
to be read, new reading devices may make them convenient, comfortable,
and portable.
What about the feel of paper? So many objections
to e-books bemoan the loss of tactile connection. But on the horizon
is a product called e-paper, or sometimes smart paper. The same
technology now used in programmable wallpaper, with changing patterns,
is being developed for use in e-books, creating the possibility
that one day in the future e-books will be soft and pliable, even
able to be rolled up or folded in a pocket. But the digital cat
would still be out of the bag. Even with e-paper there’d be
no need to return to the limitations of paper.
Here’s the granddaddy of all objections:
that an e-book depends on a device, a delivery system, and a paper
book does not. Well, it’s interesting how new things help
us see old things in new ways. Yes, an e-book depends on a delivery
device. But a printed book itself is a delivery device — and
one that requires cutting and processing trees, manufacturing, printing,
trucking, and warehousing. All this — and one printed book
delivers just one novel, anthology, reference work, or picture book.
But one e-book device can deliver many thousands times more. Potentially,
one device could deliver every bit of content of every book in the
world ever written.
And with its backlit, glowing screen, a good e-book
could be enjoyed in bed, under the covers, in the dark — and
what kid wouldn’t love that!
AS ILLUSTRATORS ARE loosening our paper bonds,
so, too, can picture books. We’re able to create digital books
because we’re becoming technologically and psychologically
ready to create them and because our imaginations are lifting off
the page. And some book illustrators’ imaginations began
this “liftoff” years ago.
I’m sure you’ve noticed the oddball
picture book here and there. In retrospect, they didn’t just
depart from the norm; they were pointing to something new. David
Macaulay’s Black and White (Lorraine/Houghton), winner
of the 1991 Caldecott Medal, is an ambitious, multi-linear scheme
in which four stories are told simultaneously on divided double-page
spreads. All four progress together and even exchange visual elements
before resolving. Art Spiegelman’s Open Me . . .
I’m a Dog! (Cotler/HarperCollins) claims not to be a
book at all but rather a beagle enchanted by a wizard. The story
practically sits up and begs to be understood: though it may look
like a book, it’s really so much more, your very own pet,
in fact. It even comes with a leash attached to its spine.
Then there’s David Wiesner’s stunning
The Three Pigs (Clarion). We are never so aware of the
medium of paper as we are in this picture book. In fact, the flatness
of books is constantly played against the dimensionality of the
pigs, who even cast shadows to emphasize their roundness. Wiesner’s
pigs interact with picture-book pages: they disassemble them, cavort
with them, crumple them, and, finally, fold them into a paper airplane
on which they are then propelled into space, liberated from the
surface of the page. Liftoff!
These three books share an interesting restlessness;
something is alive and struggling under their skins. They wrestle
with the conventional limitations of picture books as linear, constrained,
and flat. I don’t know if Wiesner or Spiegelman or Macaulay
intended, endorse, or even considered the possibility, but I believe
these works point toward a new form of picture book — the
digital picture book. Like the three pigs lifting off the page,
we digitally aware artists feel we are lifting off the page, too.
WE NEEDN’T BE afraid of moving in a direction
that seems to change everything about books, because everything
would not have to change. Almost everything we value in picture
books for children should and could be retained in digital picture
books. Now is the time to articulate principles that foster the
love of reading in young children, even when the medium is digital.
I suggest the following as a start:
The reader should be the prime mover.
Just as in a traditional picture book, no matter what the digital
book is capable of, the reader should direct the experience, determining
the pace, backtracking or even skipping ahead. The reader should
read. Unlike watching a video, the child won’t passively
watch pictures while a text is being “told” via an audio
file. A digital book should be portable, convenient, and comfortable.
It should be able to be shared with a grownup on a lap, a bed, or
under a tree. (With the advent of e-paper, it could become flexible
and soft as well.) Lastly, it’s my hope that the digital
picture book would tell a story in ways paper books cannot.
Recognizing that our commitment is to the story
and not to paper is powerful fuel for picture book creators; it’s
all we need for liftoff.
FOR ME, THE CONCEPT of digital picture books is
less about “embracing the future” and much more about
our now. If we once framed the cosmos with a black-and-white sensibility,
we are now swimming in a vivid Technicolor reality. If we once perceived
the world as flat, it is now understood to be dimensional. Why shouldn’t
our art and our stories reflect this? The printed book is a beautiful,
ancient, enduring form that will continue to exist. But these new
tech tools are exquisitely appropriate for our time. To resist them
seems to me to be not quite present. Although different tools may
produce different kinds of tales, we are simply furthering the narrative
of our one long tale. We are still moving along the age-old
thread of storytelling.
Meanwhile, our young readership is restless and
waiting to be engaged. They are even more ready for the reading
revolution than we are. We owe it to them to explore the fantastic
potential of digital picture books.
Jean
Gralley is the author-illustrator of The Moon Came Down
on Milk Street (Holt). Her article is adapted from a paper
delivered at the annual conference of the Children’s Literature
Association in Winnipeg, Canada, on June 9, 2005. Her accompanying
digital animation, “Books Unbound,”is available
on her website. |
 |
From the January/February 2006 issue of
The Horn Book Magazine

More on new media
|