| |
From
the November/December 2006 issue of The Horn Book Magazine
The Mary Sue Project
BY LELAC ALMAGOR
And now there was no mistaking it and all five
children — Peter, Susan, Edmund, Lucy, and Mackenzie — stood
blinking in the daylight of a winter day. Behind them were coats
hanging on pegs, in front of them were snow-covered trees.
hen
my class writes fiction, we almost always start with ourselves:
not our own lives, necessarily, but our bodies, memories, dreams,
desires. My students — fifth-grade girls — are just
beginning to find the language for their sensations, and of course
it’s easier to describe what you’re feeling right now
than a feeling you remember, and easier to describe a feeling you
remember than a feeling you imagine. They produce their very best
sensory descriptions when I can get them to put pencil to paper
while the marshmallows are still melting on their tongues. (Student:
“The taste is changing in my mouth! Quick, write this down!”)
Describing their own selves, or the story-selves they develop, proves
their only reliable alternative to writing about the Planet of the
Tall, Slender, Blonde, and Incidentally Also Graduated from Harvard
at Sixteen. (More on this later.)
In the winter, our characters go visiting: each
girl chooses a climactic moment from a favorite novel and writes
herself into the story, in the third person, as one of the main
characters. Neil Gaiman’s Coraline becomes Coraline
and Caroline, in which twin sisters face off together against
the “other mother”; the feral cat clans of Erin Hunter’s
Warrior series flourish under the leadership of newcomer Snowfur,
known in real life as Camille. (Student: “Should the same
things still happen in the story?” Me: “I don’t
know — will they be the same with you there?”)
The project starts while we’re nearing the
end of Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time,
and many of my girls have lost patience with Meg’s jealousy,
her stubbornness, her whining. (They don’t like adolescent
Harry Potter, either. Maybe they will in a year or two.) Meg, Calvin,
and Charles Wallace are wandering Camazotz in search of Meg’s
father; on the whiteboard and in our notebooks, we keep a list of
each character’s recent comments and actions, so that we can
figure out his or her shifting agenda. The girls empathize with
Meg, to some extent, but they want her to shut up.
Before we begin to write, I inform the class that
we are undertaking a very special competition. I will place them
in teams of three; I will read the instructions one time; they will
have ten minutes to work. Are they ready? Are they ever.
They grip their desks and giggle at a frequency inaudible to adult
ears. (They never ask why we’re doing this, or what the prize
is — either because they are fifth graders and cheerfully
disposed or because by February they are used to a certain degree
of eccentricity in their English classes.) The task is something
quick and silly that I borrow from the math teacher: building the
highest possible freestanding tower using a bag of party balloons
and a roll of masking tape, for example. For ten minutes, though,
it’s deadly serious. They scrawl blueprints, hiss instructions,
hyperventilate.
Once time is up and the towers have been measured
and set aside, I ask the girls to open their notebooks, add a fourth
column alongside Meg, Calvin, and Charles Wallace — and write
down everything they had said to their partners while they worked.
Looking at the list of their comments, they analyze their role in
the group, just as they’ve analyzed those of the fictional
characters. They are remarkably keen readers of their own language:
“I had a lot of good ideas, but I said them pretty quietly,
so we did someone else’s idea, and then I was even more quiet
because I wanted to do mine.” “I was always explaining
why ideas wouldn’t work. Even my ideas. But I was right! I
wasn’t just being difficult.” The balloon-tower
exercise provides textual evidence that becomes the basis for each
girl’s literary character in the episode she rewrites.
The students quickly discover that fitting a new
character into the story means dismantling the original prose to
see how it works. Those who use A Wrinkle in Time read
the original trio’s interactions very differently when they
imagine their own dialogue in the conversation. Though they’re
thrilled that they can finally tell Meg directly to shut up, they
begin to identify with her urgency and anger as well. They notice
her subtle, desperate possessiveness toward both Charles Wallace
and Calvin, and their story-selves resent it even as they compete
with her for the boys’ attention. They see, also, how the
tension between the three characters drags them toward resolution
and toward failure. To the writers’ surprise, adding the fourth
character seems to tip the narrative off-balance, so that the group
almost never finds its way to the Man with Red Eyes. As they work,
the girls become increasingly sensitive to the distinction between
character in real life and as a literary construction. (Student:
“I’m not really always like this, but it makes more
sense in the story this way.”)
Most interesting to me as a teacher are the roles
my students do — and don’t — feel comfortable
assuming. Some girls immediately seize the hero’s spotlight:
solving the mystery, leading the charge, saving the day. But a significant
minority see themselves as a liability to the mission. (Student:
“I’m just not as brave as these characters. I’ve
never done anything like this.”) These girls cast themselves
as bumbling comic sidekicks, annoying little sisters, and, occasionally,
love interests for male protagonists. Their avoidance of the conventional
heroic role produces the most intriguing endings, though —
anticlimaxes, disappointments, and dead ends.
In class I’ve always called this assignment
the Adventure Chapter, but privately I think of it as the Mary Sue
Project. The term Mary Sue comes from the fanfiction community
— people who, mostly on the Internet, rework characters from
published texts into a huge and vibrant web of short stories, poetry
cycles, group-writing ex-periments, role-playing games, novel-length
serials, pornography, and every other literary or nearly literary
form imaginable, for no profit other than their own enjoyment. The
Harry Potter series seems to generate the greatest volume of material;
quite often, though, the hero of the story is no longer Harry Potter
or Hermione Granger but a beautiful, brilliant, beloved teenaged
newcomer who bears an uncanny resemblance to the author. In the
story she’s likely to be named Serena or Kaori or Artemis,
but critics call her Mary Sue.
Fanfiction readers love to mock the Mary Sue stories,
which often plunge past the niceties of plot or purpose in order
to get to the wish fulfillment. But I confess that Mary Sue-ism
represents one of my favorite ways of reading for pleasure. I want
badly to imagine myself at Hogwarts, to Sort myself into a House
and talk back to the protagonists and make up my own spells. I love
that in the Mary Sue Project my girls involve themselves so intimately
in stories, take them personally, inhabit them — and read
more critically as a result.
But even when the girls readily find roles for
their characters, they can’t always make space for themselves.
More often than not, my students choose fantasy and magic and adventure
for this project; there’s nothing exciting about pretending
to live in a realistic story about regular kids. And more often
than not, in this project, my black, Hispanic, and Asian students’
characters develop long blonde ringlets and sparkling violet eyes.
They manage to leave those clichés behind when they write
historical fiction and school stories, the genres in which we find
more than a handful of nonwhite writers and nonwhite protagonists.
But if they want to rescue their parents or travel through time
or tame dragons or lead armies or quest for love or save the world,
their only choice is to write themselves into stories that are exclusively,
blindingly, obliviously white. My theory is that these novels are
so white that racial difference becomes impossible within them;
the girls are not persuaded that they, in their own skins, could
ever be Coraline’s best friend or Hermione’s long-lost
cousin.
The next step, then, is to make sure my girls can
see themselves in the pages. I’m forever on the lookout for
a wider range of well-told stories about nonwhite children. (Ask
our fantastic school librarian, who’s probably tired of pulling
possible candidates for me.) In the meantime, my Plan B is for this
writing project itself to spark literary activism: to ask students
explicitly who gets to be in the original story, who’s left
out and why, and what we can do about it. I want next year’s
fifth graders to see this project as an opportunity to claim space
for themselves even where the books they read have not made it readily
available. When they are the writers — or rewriters —
then the power to question, subvert, and renovate their fiction
is in their hands.
Lelac
Almagor teaches English at the National Cathedral School for
Girls in Washington, D.C. |
 |

More Reading &
Community
|
|