| From
the March/April 2008 issue of The Horn Book Magazine
Foreign Correspondence
Why We Love the New Children’s Laureate
by madelyn travis
he
event to inaugurate Britain’s new Children’s Laureate
was quite a glamorous affair, with a surprising number of gatecrashers
appearing at the door of BAFTA, the British Academy of Film and
Television Arts, home of the British Academy Awards. They were turned
away politely, and although most went quietly, some did not. The
assembled teachers, librarians, academics, journalists, booksellers,
and assorted others dressed for the occasion, but, never one to
stand on ceremony, the as-yet-unannounced guest of honor showed
up in a T-shirt and slightly scruffy trousers. When the new children’s
laureate was revealed to be the poet Michael Rosen, a cheer went
up in the crowded room. The reaction to the announcement was indicative
not only of the level of warmth toward Rosen himself but also of
a feeling that his tenure in the post would be exciting —
even edgy — with the potential to take the laureateship to
new heights.
Michael Rosen is the fifth person to be appointed
Britain’s children’s laureate. The idea for the position
grew out of a conversation between prolific children’s author
Michael Morpurgo and the then poet laureate, Ted Hughes. They conceived
it as a cross between an ambassadorial role and a lifetime achievement
award. The government agreed to fund the biennial post with a stipend
of £10,000. The first children’s laureate, appointed
in 1999, was illustrator Quentin Blake, followed by author Anne
Fine, Morpurgo, and, most recently, Jacqueline Wilson. In addition
to a lecture series that goes along with the job, each laureate
has initiated a campaign, lasting the duration of their tenure,
in support of reading for pleasure. The lectures themselves have
been almost incidental to the laureate’s workload, for to
date the award has gone to writers and illustrators who have been
prolific not just in their literary output but in their many public
appearances at schools and literary festivals.
Inevitably, anyone taking on the role of children’s
laureate is expected to comment on any and every news item with
even a vague connection to children’s literature. Not everyone
wants to be an official spokesperson, though, and some otherwise
likely candidates feel unable to put themselves in the public eye
for two years for whatever reason. This makes choosing a laureate
rather more complicated than simply picking the person with the
most votes. Nominations are received from organizations concerned
with children’s books and from children themselves, and then
a shortlist is drawn up. At that stage, delicate behind-the-scenes
negotiations take place to avoid the potential embarrassment of
announcing a winner who then says, “Thanks, but no thanks.”
Most of the media appearances by the first four
laureates have been, rather predictably, to do with children’s
books. Not so with Michael Rosen. He is the host of Word of
Mouth, a series on BBC Radio 4 exploring aspects of the spoken
word. He is an outspoken socialist and (Jewish) anti-Zionist and
regularly publishes letters in the left-wing national newspaper
The Guardian, often on education issues but also on international
politics. He has a Ph.D. and teaches a children’s literature
class in an English master’s program. In recent years he has
written three volumes of autobiographical poetry for adults, and
Penguin has published his selected poems — that’s Penguin,
not Puffin, the children’s imprint. Unlike many children’s
authors, Rosen doesn’t have to convince anyone that his views
are worth listening to. Perhaps that’s why his appointment
yielded extensive, high-profile coverage ranging from a cover feature
in The Guardian magazine to the lead item on the BBC’s
highbrow current affairs TV show Newsnight. It was news
that a new children’s laureate had been chosen; that the appointee
was Rosen was what made it headline news.
During the selection process for the first four
children’s laureates the same names, including Rosen’s,
kept cropping up on the nomination forms, so it was pretty much
a matter of time before the award came his way. The poet is a fierce
critic of the way literature is taught in the classroom and of the
increasing amount, and nature, of testing in schools. Therefore,
even up to a couple of years ago, there was some concern that the
government might not approve of funding an appointee who so publicly
criticizes its policies. Thankfully, such fears have proved unfounded:
the government was content to let the independent selection panel
do its job. And part of the reason many people professionally involved
with children’s books were so cheered by his appointment was
because of his very outspokenness about the state of education,
his belief in the importance of reading for pleasure, and his horror
at the reduction of literature in schools to snippets of text and
prescriptive interpretations of poetry. Rosen says the things others
are thinking; unlike many, he doesn’t have to worry about
political retribution before opening his mouth.
As an author, Rosen has written in various genres
and for a range of age groups. His numerous picture books include
This Is Our House and his latest, Bear’s Day
Out, as well as successful retellings of Little Rabbit
Foo Foo and We’re Going on a Bear Hunt, which
was a 1990 Boston Globe–Horn Book honor book. He has written
books about Dickens and Shakespeare and edited collections of poetry
and humorous stories. His novels for middle-grade readers, You’re
Thinking about Doughnuts and You’re Thinking about
Tomatoes, are probably his most overtly political works for
children, touching on Britain’s colonial past. He is a master
of nonsense verse, but it is his autobiographical prose poetry that
is Rosen’s greatest contribution to children’s literature.
Initially inspired by James Joyce and Carl Sandburg,
Rosen quickly found his own voice, writing about his childhood from
a child’s perspective. His style was closer to everyday speech
than to poetry, his milieu the ordinary London suburbs.
I was walking home from school
with Mr Baggs
the teacher who took us for football
and he said:
‘You see Michael, what we need in the team
is a really good centre-half,
someone who can control the game from midfield
collect the ball in the middle
distribute the ball to the front players.
A good centre-half can turn a game.
He can make all the difference.
Now who have we got playing in the middle?
— oh, my goodness it’s you
I forgot
I’m sorry
I wasn’t thinking
no hard feelings, OK?
After the rural idylls described by earlier British
poets for children such as Robert Louis Stevenson, Rosen’s
work came as a breath of fresh air. Some appreciated it immediately,
with both John Rowe Townsend and Brian Alderson praising the new
poet in national newspapers. After Mind Your Own Business
(1974) came equally acclaimed collections including You Can’t
Catch Me! (1981), Quick, Let’s Get Out of Here
(1983), Don’t Put Mustard in the Custard (1985),
and You Wait Till I’m Older than You! (1996). It
was only after he was well established that some began to complain
that his work somehow wasn’t “proper” poetry,
that it took free verse to an unwelcome extreme.
The detractors, though, were in a small minority;
most preferred to judge what Rosen calls his “paragraphs”
on their own terms. As for child readers, they like Rosen’s
work and they like the man, too, both on paper and in person. The
essence of his personality comes across in anecdotes about his childhood,
the memorable friendships in and out of school, the antics that
drove his father to distraction, the glimpses of family life with
his own children Joe and Eddie. It was Eddie’s death that
Rosen subsequently wrote about with such raw honesty in Michael
Rosen’s Sad Book and the volume of poetry for adults,
Carrying the Elephant.
Rosen’s schedule of appearances at schools
and literary events is full months in advance, and this is no surprise.
His performances — in which poetry is delivered with impeccable
comedic
timing and audience participation is welcome — break down
the barriers between poet and pupil, adult and child. Rosen shows
children that poetry is more than just incomprehensible stuff they
have to sit through in school; not only can they understand it,
they can also create it and enjoy it — sometimes it can even
make them laugh. As children’s laureate, Rosen will preside
over an interactive poetry-friendly classroom, which will offer
tips via videos and message boards on how to make poetry fun for
everyone in the classroom, including the many teachers who themselves
find poetry intimidating.
A champion of diversity in all its forms, Rosen’s
other pet project for his laureateship is a poetry road show entitled
“Diverse Verse for All.” He wants it to encompass everyone
from John Agard to Benjamin Zephaniah, along the way taking in poets
such as Roger McGough and even those who can’t be there in
person, like Robert Louis Stevenson.
When Rosen gave his first official lecture as children’s
laureate he began by playing the role of a teacher giving a lesson
on Walter de la Mare’s poem The Listeners. He read
out the poem, then said, “The first things I’d like
you to do are: 1. Identify the poetic techniques in the poem. 2.
Do a syllabic count. 3. Answer this question: Are there any similarities
with the ballad poem we read last week?” Laughter from the
audience, then: “Next I’ve got a couple of comprehension
questions for you: 1. Who is the traveler? 2. Who are the listeners?
Then I want you to look at the structure of the poem and answer
these questions: 1. What happens in the poem? 2. Where does one
section end and the next begin? And finally I want you to: 1. Look
at the words in the poem which describe sounds. 2. Write down in
which sections of the poem there are noises and in which silence.”
Rosen then took a closer look at the questions, demonstrating why
such a method of teaching is bound to turn children off poetry and
excoriating an education system that would require such questions
to be asked in the first place. “Poetry is a kind of writing
that refuses to be tied down,” he said. “Very often,
there just isn’t enough stuff there for us to make the definitive
statement. What’s more, the very act of trying to wring this
statement out of the poem — or worse — out of children,
is anti-poem. It runs against the grain of the poetic impulse, which
more often than not, is an impulse to suggest, imply, hint, infer
and to withhold even as it reveals.”
He ended, appropriately, with a new poem of his
own:
Take the thing into your hands
and open it.
You can open it anyway you like.
Many people say that there is a front
and a back
A right way up
and an upside down
But don’t be put off by that.
You can open it anyway you like.
You see that door in the side of your head?
Open it.
Now, move the thing in your hands
in any way you like:
Side to side, round and round,
over and over.
Perhaps you’ll see that there are
sheets that can be turned over.
You can turn them over and back
You can also hold it still
and move your head.
You can hold your head still
and move your eyes.
Has anything started to come through
the door?
I hope so.
If things do start coming through
the door
I’m fairly sure that they will
start dancing in the room inside.
Or sitting on the chairs
or standing on the table
or shouting
or being rude to people you don’t like
or even being rude to people you do like
or kissing
or dying
or going on a boat
or taking things out of their pockets
and showing them to you.
Some of these things
you may have never seen before.
But now you know them.
Some are as familiar to you as potatoes.
But these potatoes are different.
When you get tired of all this
why not put down the thing in your hands?
And close the door.
Some of the things that came inside
will stay.
You may well start dressing them up
in things that you like.
You might change the tune they were
dancing to.
You might ask them to keep
taking things out of their pockets.
One day
you might find yourself saying the same
rude things.
Or you might change the words round
to make them ruder.
You might go on the boat.
You might start kissing.
I won’t say anymore about what else you might do.
If you’ve liked doing all this
I think you’ll probably try to take
another one of these things into your hands
and start all over again.
And then the things that come through
the door the next time
will meet the people who came through
the door last time.
You may even start turning them into each
other.
Look, there’s a man hiding under a sheep
so that a giant won’t eat him.
And there’s a boy running away from
a giant down a beanstalk.
And now you’ve gone and made the man under the sheep
run down a beanstalk.
Well, well, well.
Madelyn
Travis is associate editor of The Journal of Children’s
Literature Studies and features editor for www.booktrusted.com,
the children’s book website of the London-based educational
charity Booktrust. She is pursuing a Ph.D. in children’s
literature at the University of Newcastle. |
 |
From the March/April 2008
issue of The Horn Book Magazine

More Michael Rosen
|