| |
From
Page to Screen
Mike Newell’s
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
by Anita L. Burkam
With millions of fans worldwide passionate in
their devotion to the boy wizard, Harry Potter is practically
in a publishing category by itself — J. K. Rowling can do
no wrong. So when directors undertake to film a movie version of
a Harry Potter book, the scrutiny is intense. Moviegoers
demand a movie that is absolutely faithful to the book in plot,
sequence, interpretation, and tone yet at the same time appears
fresh and lively in its new medium. This raises a certain difficulty.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire runs 734 pages in print,
ranging over a Quidditch World Cup match, a special Triwizard Tournament
at Hogwarts, the entire Hogwarts term (including hints of burgeoning
adolescent attraction between Ron and Hermione and between Harry
and Cho) — and oh yes, the return of the most evil wizard
who ever lived, Lord Voldemort. How can director Mike Newell fit
all that into a standard-length movie?
Not entirely successfully, as it turns out. In
the movie’s two-and-a-half-hour run time, Newell walks a precarious
tightrope, required to shoehorn the maximum amount of exposition
into each scene just to get through the plot, but wanting to satisfy
viewers’ expectations for a satisfying wallow in Harry’s
world. Especially in the beginning, exposition wins out as Newell
cuts scenes short in order to move on, introducing minor characters
on the fly (Cornelius Fudge, Barty Crouch — and does everyone
remember Ginny Weasley?) and hoping the audience has a good memory
for faces. The movie ticks through critical plot points like it’s
checking them off a list, but viewers unfamiliar with the book — or
those whose recollection has faded — might have trouble grasping
the storyline in such an abbreviated environment.
Part of Newell’s problem is that Rowling
set up a very strong plot device — the Triwizard Tournament — and
yet also had to undercut that enough to include the other work she
needs to do, especially that of arranging Voldemort’s return.
Likewise, Newell can’t cut Rowling’s initial chapter
in which a desperately weak Voldemort hints at a trap for Harry,
nor can he entirely cut the subsequent Quidditch World Cup match,
even though it’s really outside the main plot. Viktor Krum,
future Triwizard champion from Durmstrang, makes his first appearance
at the match, as do Cedric Diggory and his father, and as does a
port-key, a piece of transport magic that will later clinch the
climax. At the match (after half-a-mo’ at the Weasleys’
house, which would be cool if we really got to see it), Newell gives
the audience a mini-wallow, which is a great deal of fun — the
witches and wizards camp out on the moor with a great festival air,
the stadium is brightly lit and mind-bogglingly large, and the pre-game
show dazzles — but then the movie (disappointingly) passes over
the match itself and goes directly on to the first appearance of
the Death Eaters and the Dark Mark.
That buildup to the match is probably the last
sweetness-and-light moment in the movie. Book Four covers a pivot-point
in the direction of the seven-book series: along with Voldemort’s
return, Cedric Diggory’s death signals the end of innocence
as the tone shifts from a lighthearted school-based comedy to an
adventure hybrid that will become darker as the series continues.
Newell’s movie, the first to get a PG-13 rating rather than
PG, runs with that direction, opening with a shot of skulls to warn
viewers, if they haven’t already figured it out, that this
is not your little sister’s Harry Potter. Most of
the scenes take place at night, in pouring rain or snow, or at best
under cloudy skies, giving the movie a dark, brooding feel. The
new professor of the Dark Arts, Mad-Eye Moody, his magical eye rolling
in its socket in a faultless realization of the book’s description,
holds class in a foreboding room lined with enormous lenses that
distort light and imply surveillance and menace. Dumbledore, previously
the genial, grandfatherly, twinkly-eyed headmaster, here experiences
a distinct loss of twinkle, coming across as snappish, nervous,
and at times fearsome.
When, halfway through the movie, Newell gets to
the Triwizard Tournament, with its three challenges and built-in
climax, he can finally relax and let the story unfold. Harry’s
first trial in the tournament, in which he must fight a dragon to
claim a golden egg, is the first time the movie really digs into
a scene. Adept in the art of a gripping chase/combat scene, Newell
gives the audience a fast-paced, carefully choreographed duel, featuring
a lot of near-misses and clever physical action, including Harry
retrieving his Quidditch broom with a handy Accio spell and a breathtaking
flight over Hogwarts terrain with the dragon in hot pursuit — the
scene takes the time needed to build expectations and establish
danger. From that point on, the pace settles down from overheated
to merely brisk, and the performances flower as the young actors
are able to get traction on their characters.
Newell expertly exploits the Yule Ball and the
opportunities it presents for adolescent angst — both Harry
and Ron are in the awkward in-between stage, indicated by their
both badly needing haircuts. The boys’ agonies over asking
a girl to the dance and the contradictory feelings of initial attraction/antagonism
between Ron and Hermione may seem slightly frivolous in a movie
about the return of Voldemort, especially since the movie is so
foreshortened (another subplot from the book, Hermione’s efforts
to unionize the house elves, is cut entirely, and is unlikely to
be missed). But vicarious involvement in the characters’ emotional
lives is too juicy to pass up — the pay-off in audience engagement
and pleasure more than justifies Newell’s inclination to dally.
The second and third Triwizard challenges seem to flow naturally
from the preceding action, and the graveyard scene that caps the
climax, with Cedric blasted by the Avada Kedavra spell,
Wormtail toppling a fetus-like Voldemort into the cauldron and then
cutting off his own hand (a point mercifully not lingered on), and
Harry battling a reconstituted Voldemort and carrying Cedric’s
body back to the Triwizard game site, is swift but absolutely engrossing.
The sight of Harry sobbing over Cedric’s body is deeply touching,
although neither Rowling nor Newell allows the audience to linger,
hustling on to the unmasking of the Mad-Eye Moody impostor.
Perhaps if Harry had been a book less
beholden to its audience, Newell could have made a better movie.
Without the pressure of those eagle-eye fans criticizing any deviation
from the book, Newell and his screenwriters could have fiddled around
with voiceover narration, video montage, flashbacks — whatever
techniques they had available to dispatch the exposition faster.
When Newell does take his time, he delivers on the visuals, wowing
the audience with impressive,dramatic introductions for the competing
schools Beauxbatons and Durmstrang; the dragons, sharklike mermaids,
and ravenous maze in the three Triwizard challenges; repeated vertigo-inducing
views of the Quidditch stadium and Hogwarts itself; and Harry in
his dress robes. All that’s missing is reasonably paced and
-plotted moviemaking; one can only hope it makes a comeback in The
Order of the Phoenix.

Anita
Burkam, until recently associate editor of The Horn Book
Magazine, is a writer and moviegoer living in Maryland.
|
 |
More
about Harry Potter | More movie reviews |
|