Subscribe to The Horn Book

>Felt So Nice I Did It Twice

>Galleycat has a piece on a Las Vegas writer doing two different–very different–reviews of a book about his city, one for USA Today and the other for Las Vegas Weekly. I did that a couple of times, reviewing the same book for The Bulletin of the Center for Children’s Books and the New York Times (the Times didn’t care so long as its review was published first) on the grounds that the audiences were so different, but it’s really not fair. It’s not fair to the book if you hated it, it’s not fair to competing books if you liked it, and it’s not fair to the reader if you contradict yourself. Plus, reviewing the same book twice is hell.

Roger Sutton About Roger Sutton

Roger Sutton has been the editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc, since 1996. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his M.A. in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a B.A. from Pitzer College in 1978. Follow him on Twitter: @RogerReads.



  1. Anonymous says:

    >Color me confused. Roger do you mean that if you like a book you shouldn’t review it in two places because that means it is taking up a spot that could have been dedicated to another book, and that’s why two reviews are unfair? Or do you mean it is unfair to be inconsistent between reviews? What if, for example, you said the most recent Celebrity Book was no different from previous iterations of the same, and the offspring of NYT readers would lap it up like spilt milk, but you told Horn Book’s readers it was the same old pap and not to buy it for their libraries?

  2. Roger Sutton says:

    >I think I mean both. If I review a book in two places, I’m taking perhaps-valuable space that could go to another book or another reviewer’s point of view. And to say good-enough-for-the-Times but not-good-enough-for-the-Horn-Book is just cynical.

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind