Subscribe to The Horn Book

Paper Towns movie review

Paper Towns posterIf Paper Towns, the book by John Green (Dutton, October 2008) were a comedy, it would be Paper Towns, the movie (directed by Jake Schreier; Fox/Temple Hill, July 2015; PG-13).

That’s not to say the novel lacks funny moments. It has plenty, and the new film makes good use of them. There are pranks and witty dialogue and teens perhaps occasionally making humorously bad choices, and I laughed a lot. (With, not at, the teens, of course.) The book just offers more to think about.

The story: Quentin Jacobsen, or Q (played by Nat Wolff) and Margo Roth Spiegelman (Cara Delevingne) are neighbors who hung out together as kids. By the end of high school, they’ve drifted apart, but Q still pines for her; he believes that “everyone gets a miracle” and that living next door to Margo is his. The adventurous, unpredictable Margo ropes Q (not that he’s hard to convince) into driving her around and helping with some late-night revenge pranks against her cheating boyfriend and their friends from the popular crowd. After an exhilarating night that ends with a dance, Margo disappears, not for the first time. She leaves clues to her whereabouts, and Q devotes lots and lots of energy to following them. And that’s all I’m going to spoil about that, except to say that there’s an epic and often hilarious road trip that allows costars Austin Abrams (as Ben), Justice Smith (Radar), Halston Sage (Lacey), and Jaz Sinclair (Angela) to shine. (The teens in this movie actually look like teens!)

In both the book and the film, Margo can come off as pretty self-centered: she uses a friend she’s been ignoring for years for his wheels, and then she runs off and expects Q to interpret a string of clues that require him to pay his way into her room, comb through her records and her books, and then visit an abandoned souvenir store across town. The movie tells us she’s dissatisfied with her role as popular girl, but it doesn’t tell us enough to justify the effort Q puts in for her sake, and he just seems like an extreme example of a lovesick puppy. (In case you haven’t gathered as much, this film should not be compared to that other John Green adaptation.)

The novel makes it clearer how unhappy Margo is — during his search, Q even suspects that she may have committed suicide. Including details like that would’ve completely changed the tone of the film, but it also would’ve explained Q’s concern. From a plot standpoint, the book is more suspenseful than the movie, since it raises more possibilities about what may have happened to Margo.

It’s understandable that the movie picks a tone and sticks with it, changing or eliminating plot details when necessary and spending less time than the novel does on introspection. (After all, the movie is not a John Green novel.) If you’re in the mood for an enjoyable teen comedy, this is a decent one. But if you leave confused about the whys and wherefores, you may want to pick up the novel.

Shoshana Flax About Shoshana Flax

Shoshana Flax, assistant editor for The Horn Book, Inc., is a former bookseller and holds an MFA in Writing for Children from Simmons College.

Share
Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*