>You decide.
>You decide. But I like "Anonymous"s take-no-prisoners style in this
attack on chicklit. The argument, though, is familiar to anyone who's been through the Nancy Drew/Wildfire Romance/Goosebumps wars: bad writing (and reading of said)
drives out good. But junk has always been with us, and the audience for literary fiction has always been small. And Anonymous has a tendency to bolster questionable premises ("Chick lit claims . . .) with a muddle of not necessarily codeterminant facts (" . . . to be representative of women's lives, their hopes, fears, dreams and values"). She does this again later, with "as America increasingly devalues intellectual rigor, education and compassion, it becomes harder and harder to find a good book." What does compassion have to do with any of this?
For a more laissez-les-bon-temps-roulez attitude toward this argument, try Nick Hornby's essay on "How to Read."
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
rindambyers
>I'm with Nick...I get tetchy when I get bored...and since confessing is going on, I'll confess that I sometimes go out screaming and yelling at whoever's in my way how much I love, LOVE, love this book I haven't finished reading yet but you have GOT to start reading it now RIGHT NOW, this minute, this instant....Posted : Sep 11, 2006 06:00
Melinda
>I did think that Anon Editor's point about chick lit being mostly about high-income chicks was a valid one. Does anybody write chick lit about rural chicks who don't have a lot of cash and drives the tractor to school? But I think that rural life beats out that high-income lifestyle any day. But which gets all the press?I do like that Nick Hornsby, too.
Posted : Sep 10, 2006 03:48
Jane
>Well, as much as I love a good screed, a barbaric yawp that rails against That Which Devalues Literature, I have to (quietly) admit that in many ways I am a very middlebrow writer and reader. You will as often find me reading mysteries as Jane Austen. And I am an absolute Lt. Sharpe fanatic.So sue me.
Jane
Posted : Sep 06, 2006 07:30
Roger Sutton
>Anna, your comment about Confederacy of Dunces reminds me of an unfortunate tendency I have to recommend books I haven't finished. Like Pamuk's Snow. I was crazy about it, told all of my friends, and then . . . just never got around to the last 75 pages or so. I feel very guilty when I do that: absolve me, please!Posted : Sep 06, 2006 06:56
Anna Watkins
>Whinge-ful tigress, perhaps. I bet Anon doesn't spend much time in her local library either.Ditto thanks for the Hornby article. I often tell our library 'customers' that, while I CAN read Nathaniel Hawthorne (and Ian McEwan), I usually choose not to. I will never finish Confederacy of the Dunces, and that's OK. And I still have a darn good vocabulary.
Posted : Sep 06, 2006 03:43