>The children's-book beat at the New York Times does just fine without her.
>The children's-book beat at the
New York Times does just fine without her. Last year, they somehow got an early copy of the last Harry Potter into Michiko Kakutani's hands; now reporter Dinitia Smith has broken into S&S/Margaret K. McElderry headquarters to
swipe a copy of the "embargoed"
Peter Pan in Scarlet.
Actually, I imagine there is a copy of the manuscript in
Times children's book editor Julie Just's office just as there is in mine. Unlike the Harry Potter books from Scholastic, S&S sent out review copies of
Peter Pan in Scarlet with the proviso that no coverage appear before the pub date in October. (They wanted a signed agreement to that effect, but didn't get one from us.) That's fine by me: however "authorized," a sequel to
Peter Pan is not exactly breaking news--unless your news is breaking the embargo. Emma Dryden, you evil genius.
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
Roger Sutton
>I haven't quite figured out how to make links in the comments section; the Independent story on the Peter Pan leak is at:http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/news/article1222582.ece
Posted : Sep 01, 2006 02:41
rindawriter
>This was funny. I had no idea, I had NO idea...I am getting un-naived so quickly here...Posted : Aug 31, 2006 03:01
Monica Edinger
>I must say I too wondered --- after all, popular culturewise Peter Pan is no Harry Potter (although in a different conversation, I might well say Harry is no Peter).NYTimes is on a roll with BIG children's literature articles of late--- Gary Paulsen got serious space on Saturday.
Posted : Aug 29, 2006 12:01