I interrupt my neurotic checking of the voting progress for a little clarification and a plea.
I interrupt my neurotic checking of the voting progress for a little clarification and a plea.
FIRST, the clarification. Over the past few days I have read or heard the phrase "list of Caldecott contenders" more times that I care to admit. Often people are referring to our puny list as THE list of Caldecott contenders. ANY picture book published in these here United States by a citizen or resident of the USA is a contender. Period. Out little list is our little list. If you drag your eyeballs to
September you can see how we wrestled the hundreds and hundreds of books down to a manageable few. We looked at reviews and the books themselves. We considered what you had to say. We tried to have different media represented. Lolly and I threw in a few titles that few had starred but we thought would be fun to talk about. We added a few more as more books were published and reviewed. We hoped we would stir a few of you up.
That's it. THERE IS NO LIST ANYWHERE OF THE CONTENDERS except in the hot little computers of the Real Committee. At this point, that list could be very very long (15 X 7 nominations=105) if there are no overlaps (OF COURSE THERE ARE OVERLAPS!) or very short if every list was exactly the same. (AGAIN: NO!) They have the list and they alone. We are just having fun trying to figure out what they might be considering. Believe me, we will never know what they are thinking until the Monday announcements and then we will only know what is honored. Those other books? Even the ones which
almost won an honor sticker? Nope, we will never know.

SECOND, the plea. Please, when you are voting, just vote one time. While we love social media and we encourage lots of voting, let's not have anyone rustling up votes from uninterested friends and neighbors. Just vote your heart. It has come to our attention that there has been a little social media vote grabbing and, while that might work on American Idol, we aren't really about that. We just want to know what our readership really thinks about the books, so, except for encouraging your book-loving friends to read the books and vote, let's not have any stuffing of the ballot. It skews the results and takes away from the fun.
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
KT Horning
And the whole point of secrecy, from the start, was to drive people crazy, so that we'd talk about them, thereby giving the awards more visibility and making people care about them more. That was Frederic Melcher's brilliant strategy and it has worked! He was, after all, a book seller who knew a thing or two about generating buzz.Posted : Jan 23, 2013 05:23
Sam Bloom
You know who would have had a lot to say on the subject of shortlists for the ALSC awards? Peter Seiruta - on his blog Collecting Children's Books he once included some of those lists from the 70s that KT mentioned. I'm of two minds on this. On the one hand, I definitely feel curious some years to hear what titles were discussed just because of the way the criteria are interpreted. For example, I wish I knew what the 2012 Caldecott committee had to say about Kadir Nelson's Heart and Soul (or, for that matter, what the 2009 or 10 or whatever committee thought of Nelson's We are the Ship). Did they consider the books picture books or not? And as a member of a former committee there are definitely times when I wish I could share some of the books that elicited deep discussion - the ones that just barely missed. But of course I'm sworn to secrecy on that one, shall I be struck down by lightning should I utter a word and so forth. However... what really would be the point of a shortlist? Think of last year, when so many people were up in arms about Okay For Now not winning Newbery, or even getting an Honor. Do you really think those same people would feel any comfort in knowing that it was a nominated title, had ALSC published a shortlist? I don't know for sure that it was nominated, of course, not having served on that committee... but I'd bet the farm that it was. So, what would that really do? When you really think about it, the whole awards committee process really benefits greatly from the elements of secrecy that drive those of us on the outside completely crazy at times.Posted : Jan 23, 2013 05:19
KT Horning
P.S. Susan, I learned the above by reading back issues of Top of the News, and by talking to Lillian Gerhardt, who was on the ALSC board at the time. I get the best info from talking to long-time members like Lillian and Peggy Sullivan. They both have phenomenal memories -- and strong opinions!Posted : Jan 23, 2013 04:57
KT Horning
Susan, ALSC compiled the list. It included the books that had been officially nominated by committee members and those sent in as suggestions by the general membership. There used to be a lot more of the latter. ALSC members can still send in suggestions for award consideration, and some do, but not the hundreds who used to do so. Early press after the announcement used to even indicate whether the committee and general membership had been in agreement.Posted : Jan 23, 2013 04:51
Sam Bloom
Nicely said, Robin! And I can't wait to hear the results - both the real committee's and our committee's choices... (Go Kadir!)Posted : Jan 23, 2013 11:31