>A childlit reference today to a blog post last year on Michael Thorn's Achockablog revealed a semi-juicy scandal heretofore unknown to me involving the excellent Australian writer Alyssa Brugman, who complained to her publisher that Thorn was selling an ARC of her book Being Bindy on eBay.
>A childlit reference today to a blog post last year on Michael Thorn's Achockablog revealed
a semi-juicy scandal heretofore unknown to me involving the excellent Australian writer Alyssa Brugman, who complained to her publisher that Thorn was selling an ARC of her book
Being Bindy on eBay. The publisher, Faber, dutifully if thickheadedly wrote Thorn to tell him to cease and desist, or they would stop sending him advance copies for review. Apparently the blogosphere was thick with reproof, because Brugman wrote
a rather stern note about the matter on the home page of her website, saying that ARCs are the property of the publisher, not the reviewer, and therefore Thorn had no right to sell them.
Personally, I think Brugman might better torture herself by contemplating the fact that Thorn had no desire to
keep his copy of her book, but the fact remains that the book was his to sell; at least it works that way on this side and end of the pond. Publishers don't lend books to reviewers, they simply hand them over. Thorn very carefully made the point that he does not sell ARCs as new books (which would be fraud) or indeed before their publication dates. The publisher is certainly within its rights not to send Thorn (or anyone) review copies if they don't want to, but this would rather defeat the purpose of review copies. (And, contrary to what one irate publisher told me, no one needs permission from the publisher to review a book.) I imagine that Faber knows this, too, and is banging its corporate head repeatedly on the table for being caught between author and reviewer on this one.
For the record: after the Horn Book has finished with its reviews, and the publishing season has passed, we cherry-pick titles to keep in our collection (everything reviewed in the
Magazine and a culling from the
Guide), give some away, make "creative art" projects out of others, consign some to a Wall of Shame, and sell the rest as a lot to a used-book wholesaler.
But if anyone knows: is this standard operating procedure among our fellow nations?
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
Colleen
>If you have any ARCs with minority characters of middle grade reading level and up then head on over to my site, chasingray.com, and click on "Books for NOLA Kids" in the sidebar.I'm working with Books2Prisoners in New Orleans and they are gathering donated ARCs, etc to build libraries in the four juvenile detention centers around the city. Those kids have nothing and any books that might appeal to them would be much appreciated.
As for me, I received about 500 ARCs last year primarily due to my column at Bookslut. Some are kept, some go to family/friends but most are donated - either to the NOLA kids or the local thrift shop run by very nice ladies from the Episcopalian Church. They make a few dollars by selling them and readers are introduced to new authors very inexpensively.
(And some books are so awful they get recycled although this happens rarely for me, thank heavens!)
I can't imagine preferring your book was destroyed then went to someone for less than the cover price. I wonder how Ms Brugman feels about used bookstores selling her book for half price? Once she figures it out, that's going to put her over the edge I'm sure!
Posted : Apr 01, 2007 11:51
Roger Sutton
>A., there's always the fireplace--which is what Brugmann seems to prefer. I did once burn a book thus and got a strangely subversive thrill.Posted : Mar 30, 2007 06:19
a. fortis
>Fascinating discussion, and timely for me, as I wonder what to do with a couple of ARCs I'm not so hep on... My options (besides dumping) seem to be A) used book store, B) library book sale (essentially, how our library gets rid of stuff it can't use), and C) friend's ten-year-old daughter. Which makes me think that perhaps the best use for the unwanted ARCs is to encourage a young person to read...unless, of course, it's just SO BAD you can't in good conscience advocate anybody reading it. Pumpkin pie for Jesus sounds like one of those.Posted : Mar 30, 2007 06:11
Daphne
>Oops! I meant that KB isn't targetted specifically at either adults or children. Of course, most Malaysian adults read it and think, "Ahhh ... the good old days ..." and most Malaysian kids read it and say, "How come he never watches TV?"Posted : Mar 30, 2007 02:13
Daphne
>I see. Over here (KB was published more than 20 years ago) it's seen as neither for adults or children. Interestingly, I see that Booklist has put it on its list of Top 10 Graphic NOvels for Teens!Posted : Mar 30, 2007 02:10