>Last Friday we had a very entertaining time of proofreading the Guide, aided by candy and fave tunes from the 80s provided by Miss Touch-Me Pod, whose little speaker recalls the halcyon days of AM transistor radios.
>Last Friday we had a very entertaining time of proofreading the
Guide, aided by candy and fave tunes from the 80s provided by Miss Touch-Me Pod, whose little speaker recalls the halcyon days of AM transistor radios. There was an ongoing war, too, over the merits of
The Time Traveler's Wife, loved by Elissa and Chelsey and hooted at derisively by Kitty and me.
But I am glad that time travel seems to be back in a big way and I'll gladly give Audrey Niffenegger the credit if she wants it. The children's book of the summer is Rebecca Stead's
When You Reach Me (see my interview with the author
here), and I'll be glad when you've all read it so we can talk about it. For those of you who have, and without giving anything away: do the kids and neighborhood remind anyone else of Vera Williams's
Scooter?
I also recently enjoyed--and
Time Traveler's Wife fans can here hoot at
me--
Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict, a chick-lit novel by Laurie Viera Rigler about a young lady of Austen's milieu whooshed into contemporary L.A. via a fall from a horse. The book is a sequel to
Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict, about the L.A. gal who trades places with the Regency one, but that conceit seemed rather more ordinary to me so I didn't pick up the book. The two books together make me think of Nancy Bond's sadly neglected
Another Shore, about a contemporary girl time-travelled back to colonial times, aware that a girl from then and there has taken her place in the present--and probably has it much, much worse.
Why is it that when I hit
my head, I only get a lump?
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
Sarah
>NO KIDDING Stacy! That's one of my problems with the book-- Time travel isn't even that interesting if you can't mess with the future a little. And I don't know how the movie ended but the book's ending totally pissed me off.Posted : Aug 24, 2009 06:39
stacy
>Oh, what validation to come here and hear all these people saying they hated TTTW. I haven't read the book, but I went to see the movie last weekend, and came out wanting my money back, not to mention my 2 hours. I was so engrossed the whole way through until the very end--so, so many continuity problems! I swear he showed up much more gray-haired at times than certain circumstances should have allowed for. And don't *even* get me started on the ending!I really hate time travel stories or foresee-the-future stories in which that future is unchangeable. If you're not allowed to change the future, then why the heck have the power?
I must admit, though, that the concept of that non-linear relationship was fascinating. I just wish it hadn't been coupled with all the predestination-can't-change-anything crap.
Posted : Aug 24, 2009 07:40
Anonymous
>oops! of course I meant to say "those persons who gave you . . . aren't readers..." blog language is sloppyPosted : Aug 22, 2009 12:27
Anonymous
>are you sure that the persons who gave you those two books isn't a reader of this blog? how embarrassing for them to learn that you dumped their (presumably) thoughtful giftsPosted : Aug 21, 2009 07:14
Anonymous
>TTTW was one of two books I received as birthday presents. (The other was Edgar Sawtelle.) Felt compelled to finish both, although reading them was tedious, and I gladly donated them to my local charity when I was finished.Posted : Aug 18, 2009 08:15