>"Little did he know"

>That line is the tipoff, in Stranger than Fiction, to English professor Dustin Hoffman that Will Ferrell might be telling the truth when he says that he can hear someone (Emma Thompson, we know) narrating his life. Hoffman says that he teaches a whole seminar on "little did he know," and while this seems meant to be a joke about the excesses of literary theory, you really could teach a whole lot about "little did he know" and similar reveals of an author's hand. The line also made me remember my days as Zena Sutherland's assistant--Zena hated "little did he know," and the presence of it or its variations ("had she but known," etc.) in a novel meant a mandatory point deduction in a BCCB review.

We missed this movie in the theater, where it must have come and gone in a minute. When we watched it last night, I kept thinking how much I wanted a Queen Latifah in my life--she plays an "author's assistant," hired by Emma Thompson's publisher to do whatever it takes to get Emma to finish her book. Which Emma does, like, three times, while the movie tries to figure out where and how it wants to end. I was happiest with ending number two. But see it if you can; this movie is one of the more satisfying examples of the fourth-wall cracking we've been seeing so much of lately.
Roger Sutton
Roger Sutton

Editor Emeritus Roger Sutton was editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc., from 1996-2021. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his MA in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a BA from Pitzer College in 1978.

Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


Anonymous

>on the real, this movie is about a man trying to change his fate in light of the fact that he knows. The characters in these films have a sense of enlightenment even with "little did he know", because its the easiest way to describe the premise, it said another way it would conflict with what the basis if the film is about. foreshadowing is a tool that can be deceptive, the writer obiously meant it as a joke to tell a funny story.

Posted : Jul 14, 2011 02:39


Michael D Evans

>But the thing is Harold DID know he was going to die as soon as the author wrote it. And suddenly thereafter she was writing it that he knew he was going to die, but as if he still didn't know. Plus she knowingly writes him calling her but is suddenly surprised that he is.
It's a great and humorous film: one of my favourites, but the literary part; the actual book featured in it makes no sense. Could you imagine what that book would be like if it was actually written? Just think about it: "little did he know..."; yet he does know - Actually, that sounds even more funny: An author oblivious as to what their character is fully aware of what the author is writing them into? Haha!

Posted : May 31, 2011 02:45


Pablo Herrera

>About "little did he know."
Imagine you are a writer and you know your character is going to die. But you decide that you are not the only person who deserves knowing this information, so you create a narrator who knows the same things about the story. The narrator is telling you the story as he "witnesses" it, and he mocks about the character: "Little did he know how he was going to die." The narrator laughs because he knows it, the author knows it, and now the reader knows it. The only person not knowing the character is going to die, is the character himself! It is a tragedy, because destiny will led him to his death; but, wouldn't you laugh at that?

Posted : Apr 12, 2011 06:20


Sebastian Sulinski

>I've just watched this movie last night and really enjoyed it. The part, which I think was pretty interesting was the first meeting in the bakery - this obviously has nothing to do with 'little did he know', phrase, which I really like the sound of, but the answer to the question why someone might have not paid their taxes in full - 'I'm a bit supporter of fixing pot holes, building shelters - I am more than happy to pay these taxes. I'm just not such a big fan of the percentage that government uses for national defense, corporate bailouts... therefore I didn't pay those taxes' - really good line.

Posted : Feb 19, 2011 02:05


Cassandra Krivy Hirsch

>Hi. I just found your blog because I Googled "little did he know." I watched "Stranger than Fiction" last night with my 8th grade daughter who loves reading and writing. It'll take another viewing and maybe a few more years for her to catch on to some of the nuanced ideas in the film, but we both loved it. The thing I found interesting was that Hoffman's character didn't correct Ferrell's who identified "little did he know" as 3rd person omniscient; in fact, he agreed with this. So, I was wondering if you heard in the narration, as I did, that the writer was very occasionally including the watch's point of view - and perhaps also Anna's. Mostly, however, it was predominantly Harold Crick's p.o.v. narrated in that tricky close 3rd person.

What are your thoughts?

Posted : Sep 26, 2009 10:49


View More Comments

RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing.

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?