I've been reading soprano Barbara Hendricks's memoir, Lifting My Voice, and it's led me not only to a rewarding reacquaintance with her singing but to some thinking about the relationship between the artist and the critic. Hendricks spills a suspicious amount of ink over how she doesn't pay any attention to critics (whose opinions of her highly distinctive voice have long been divided), but even if the lady doth protest too much for me to exactly believe her, her essential argument--that critics aren't helpful to artists--is a good one:"A review of my performance is totally useless in teaching me about myself. Reviews reveal so much more about the reviewer than they do about the artists. Until her death Miss Tourel [Hendricks's teacher, Jennie Tourel] was my most demanding critic, and since then I have had to assume that task myself. I learned during my first year as a professional singer that a review was not the right criteria to determine how well I had done my work, whether I had done what I had set out to do. I know my repertoire and I know when I have done my best work."
We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing.
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
Roger Sutton
You should treat yourself to a star now and then.Posted : Aug 25, 2014 05:14
Sergio R.
I do them for free unless I want them to be favorable, which is rare.Posted : Aug 25, 2014 05:05
Roger Sutton
How much do you pay yourself for them?Posted : Aug 25, 2014 04:55
Sergio R.
Of course I read my reviews. And I proof-read them before publishing them.Posted : Aug 25, 2014 04:50